Skip to main content

Breeder Certification Requirements: Elbow Screening Standards Worldwide

Orthopedic Certification Specialist | International Registry Consultant

Responsible breeding of large and medium breed dogs increasingly requires documented health screening, with elbow dysplasia certification standing alongside hip evaluation as a fundamental requirement in most breeding programs. However, the landscape of certification requirements varies dramatically between countries, kennel clubs, and breed-specific organizations. Navigating this patchwork requires understanding what each registry demands, how to obtain valid certification, and how to interpret results from different systems when evaluating imported or internationally-bred dogs.

Dog at a routine health assessment

Why Certification Matters

Elbow dysplasia certification serves multiple purposes in responsible breeding programs. At the individual level, it identifies dogs with radiographic evidence of disease who should be excluded from breeding. At the population level, consistent screening creates data that enables tracking of prevalence trends and informs breeding value calculations.

Breed clubs increasingly mandate elbow certification for breeding stock, and many puppy buyers now expect documentation as evidence of health-conscious breeding practices. Failure to screen breeding stock not only risks producing affected puppies but increasingly marks breeders as uninformed or indifferent to health considerations.

Dog undergoing a health evaluation

Certification Limitations

Certification documents phenotype at a single point in time, not genotype. A Grade 0 certificate indicates absence of radiographic disease at the screening age; it does not guarantee that the dog cannot produce affected offspring or that disease will not develop later. Breeding decisions should integrate certification results with pedigree analysis, not rely on individual screening alone.

Major Certification Registries

Several organizations provide elbow dysplasia certification, each with distinct requirements, procedures, and grading systems. Understanding these differences enables appropriate interpretation of documentation from various sources.

Orthopedic Foundation for Animals (OFA)

The OFA provides the primary elbow certification system in North America, maintaining a searchable public database of over 750,000 elbow evaluations.

OFA Requirements

  • Minimum age: 24 months for official certification; preliminary evaluations available from 4 months
  • Required views: Three views (flexed ML, extended ML, CrCd)
  • Identification: Microchip or tattoo linked to radiographs
  • Submission: Digital (DICOM preferred) or film radiographs
  • Evaluation: Three independent OFA radiologists; consensus determines grade
  • Reporting: Normal results published; abnormal results optional owner consent
OFA Certificate Number Format
GS-EL12345M24-NOPI

GS = Breed code (German Shepherd) | EL = Elbow | 12345 = Sequential number | M = Male | 24 = Age in months | NOPI = Normal with permanent ID

BVA/KC Elbow Scheme (United Kingdom)

The British Veterinary Association and Kennel Club jointly administer the UK elbow scheme, notable for reporting individual elbow scores rather than a single grade.

BVA/KC Requirements

  • Minimum age: 12 months
  • Required views: Three views (neutral ML, flexed ML, CrCd)
  • Identification: Microchip required; must match KC registration
  • Submission: Radiographs to BVA scrutineers via KC-registered veterinarian
  • Evaluation: BVA scrutineer panel
  • Reporting: Dual score format (Left:Right) with total; published via KC
BVA/KC Certificate Format
Elbow Score: Left 0 / Right 1 (Total: 1)

Individual elbow grades reported separately, allowing pedigree analysis of asymmetric disease

FCI/IEWG Member Schemes

Countries affiliated with the Federation Cynologique Internationale (FCI) generally follow International Elbow Working Group protocols, though implementation varies by national kennel club.

Country Administering Body Minimum Age Certification Format
Germany National breed clubs (e.g., SV) 12 months ED 0, ED 1, ED 2, ED 3
Netherlands Raad van Beheer 12 months ED-vrij (free), ED-TC (transitional), ED+
Sweden SKK (Swedish Kennel Club) 12 months UA 0, UA 1, UA 2, UA 3
Finland FKC (Finnish Kennel Club) 12 months 0, 1, 2, 3 with EBV calculation
Australia AVA/ANKC 12 months Dual scoring similar to BVA/KC

Breed Club Requirements

Many breed clubs impose specific elbow screening requirements beyond national kennel club minimums. These requirements typically apply to dogs used for breeding, stud registration, or club event participation.

German Shepherd Breed Clubs

German Shepherd organizations worldwide maintain rigorous health screening requirements reflecting the breed's ED prevalence and the historical leadership of German breeding programs.

  • SV (Germany): ED screening mandatory for breed survey (Korung); maximum Grade 1 for breeding approval; results recorded in Zuchtbuch
  • GSDCA (USA): Recommends OFA certification for all breeding stock; mandatory for ROM (Register of Merit) program
  • GSDL (UK): KC Assured Breeder Scheme requires BVA/KC elbow scoring

Labrador Retriever Clubs

  • LRC (USA): Recommends OFA elbow certification for all breeding stock
  • LRCGB (UK): BVA/KC elbow scoring advised; breed health scheme encourages participation

Rottweiler Clubs

Given the breed's high ED prevalence (38%+ OFA data), Rottweiler organizations emphasize screening:

  • ADRK (Germany): ED screening mandatory for breeding; Grade 0-1 acceptable
  • ARC (USA): Recommends OFA certification; mandatory for Code of Ethics compliance

Breed-Specific Thresholds

Different breed clubs set different acceptable grade thresholds for breeding. A Grade 1 dog might be breedable under one club's rules but excluded by another. When importing or purchasing breeding stock, verify the specific requirements of your breed club rather than assuming uniform standards.

The Certification Process

Obtaining elbow certification follows a standardized process, though details vary by registry. Understanding this process ensures smooth certification without delays or rejections. The radiographic evaluation is central to this process.

Dutch Shepherd in a family setting

Step-by-Step Process

1

Verify Identification

Ensure permanent identification (microchip or tattoo) is in place and matches registration documents. Most registries require microchip scanning at the time of radiography with the number recorded on images.

2

Schedule Radiography

Select a veterinary facility with radiographic capability and experience with certification studies. Specialty orthopedic practices and teaching hospitals typically produce highest-quality studies. Confirm they can meet the specific technical requirements of your chosen registry.

3

Obtain Radiographs

Radiographs are obtained according to registry protocol (specific views, positioning requirements). Light sedation is recommended for optimal positioning. Both elbows are imaged regardless of clinical status.

4

Submit for Evaluation

Radiographs are submitted to the certification body along with required forms, identification documentation, and fees. Digital submission is standard for most registries; some still accept film.

5

Receive Results

Evaluation results are returned typically within 2-6 weeks depending on registry. Results may be delivered directly to owner, to submitting veterinarian, or both. Published databases are updated for registries with open reporting.

Cost Considerations

Certification costs vary significantly by geographic location, facility type, and whether sedation is used. Breeders should budget appropriately for routine screening of breeding stock.

Service Component Typical Cost (USD) Notes
Radiographs (no sedation) $150-250 General practice rate
Radiographs (with sedation) $250-400 Recommended for optimal positioning
OFA evaluation fee $35-50 Per evaluation (elbows)
BVA/KC submission £60-80 Current UK fee schedule
Combined elbow + hip screening $350-550 Single anesthesia event; more cost-effective

Interpreting International Certificates

When evaluating imported dogs or pedigrees with international screening data, understanding equivalencies between grading systems is essential.

Status OFA BVA/KC IEWG/FCI German (SV)
Clear/Normal Normal 0:0 (Total 0) Grade 0 ED 0 (ED-frei)
Mild Grade I 0:1, 1:0, 1:1 Grade 1 ED 1
Moderate Grade II 2:0, 0:2, 2:1, 1:2, 2:2 Grade 2 ED 2
Severe Grade III 3:any Grade 3 ED 3

Approximate equivalencies; evaluation criteria differ slightly between systems

Cross-Border Evaluation Caution

Identical radiographs may receive different grades under different systems due to variation in evaluator criteria, grading thresholds, and technical requirements. A dog scored Grade 0 under one system might receive Grade 1 under another. When breeding decisions depend on precise grade determination, consider having critical dogs evaluated under your local system regardless of existing international certification.

Common Certification Problems

Certain issues commonly cause certification delays or rejections. Avoiding these problems streamlines the certification process:

Rottweiler with food bowl

Reasons for Rejection

  • Positioning errors: Excessive rotation, insufficient flexion, or improper beam centering (see radiographic requirements)
  • Image quality: Underexposure, overexposure, motion blur, or inadequate collimation
  • Missing views: Incomplete view sets per registry requirements
  • Identification issues: Microchip not visible/recorded, mismatch with registration
  • Age non-compliance: Dog below minimum age for official certification
  • Missing documentation: Incomplete application forms or registration papers

Preventing Problems

  • Use facilities experienced with certification radiography
  • Request light sedation for optimal positioning
  • Verify microchip functionality before appointment
  • Double-check age eligibility for chosen registry
  • Review submission requirements completely before radiography
  • Consider preliminary evaluation if official certification age is distant

Record Keeping and Documentation

Maintaining proper records of elbow certification enables pedigree analysis and meets breed club requirements for breeding documentation.

  • Retain original certificates (digital or paper) indefinitely
  • Keep copies of submitted radiographs for future reference
  • Record certification numbers in breeding documentation
  • Verify database publication for registries with open reporting
  • Document screening of all breeding stock, not just certified dogs

Conclusion

Elbow dysplasia certification represents a fundamental component of responsible breeding in susceptible breeds. Understanding the requirements of relevant registries, obtaining high-quality radiographs through appropriate facilities, and maintaining proper documentation enables breeders to demonstrate health-conscious practices and contribute to population-level disease reduction. While certification has limitations and does not guarantee genetic clearance, it remains the most practical and widely available tool for identifying affected individuals and informing breeding decisions.

Primary Sources: OFA Application Guidelines (2024); BVA/KC Elbow Scheme Handbook (2023); IEWG International Standards (2018); SV Zuchtordnung (2023); FKC Health Testing Regulations (2023)